UK Waste Strategy: Bioeconomy Opportunities Aplenty

Posted in: biobased

As the UK seeks to manage its waste more sustainably, the bioeconomy stands to benefit from the opportunities this provides.

If human development is to continue in a sustainable manner, it is becoming increasingly clear that the economy of the future is going to be circular: an economic model where products, at the end of their lives, are fed back into the system in order to continue their use and extend their value. In order for this kind of economic model to work, waste needs to be minimised. This is the central tenet of the UK government’s recently published Resource & Waste Strategy. Given that the concept of circular economy is one that frequently goes hand-in-hand with the bioeconomy, what opportunities does this Strategy hold for the UK’s bioeconomy?

The Impact of Waste

In any economy, waste is something to avoid: it represents inefficient use of resources, and thus the benefits of those resources being lost. Natural resources are not infinite, and although the bioeconomy promotes the use of biomass as a resource because it is renewable, inefficient exploitation of even renewable resources can have disastrous consequences (look to deforestation and associated loss of biodiversity as an example of how this applies to biomass).

That is not to mention the waste itself: an argument based solely on resource efficiency assumes that the waste itself does not have a negative impact. However, it is well-known that in many cases, waste can cause huge damage to the environment. Waste that biodegrades in landfill will result in emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, as the waste is broken down anaerobically by microbes. Waste that finds its way into the environment can provide a serious hazard to wildlife, as no shortage of horror stories of animals that have mistaken waste for food will testify, and it is only recently that we have become aware of the scale of the damage. It is now estimated that almost every water course on the planet has been contaminated with plastic, particularly microplastics, which result from the fragmentation (but not degradation) of waste plastic.

Thus, the case is clear for better waste management: the twofold benefits of increased resource efficiency and reduced environmental damage should be reason enough, but coupled with the economic benefits of implementing a circular economy, it is no surprise that waste has become an area of interest for lawmakers.

Continue Reading

To read the rest of this article, please download the PDF version by clicking here.

For more information:

This article was written by Bob Horton, Research Analyst at NNFCC.

You might also be interested in: